Loading AuditFlow…
Field-first internal audit
AuditFlow captures inspections where the work happens — offline, with time-stamped photo evidence, a record of where each audit was submitted and a tamper-evident trail — then turns findings into tracked corrective actions. So when the BRCGS auditor, the ISO 45001 certification body or an OSHA compliance officer arrives, you open a report instead of a week of reconstruction.
Have one specific problem? Describe it and get your solution in 60 seconds
New in AuditFlow
Unit 3 fire extinguisher check passed. 1 non-conformance converted into corrective action with photos stamped by GPS.
Lockout / Tagout (LOTO) verification · question 7 of 15 · Safety Officer / Maintenance Lead
Zero-energy verification (try-step) is performed before work starts
The single most skipped step
OSHA OSHA.1910.147
The score is 90.91% and the audit still failed, because a critical question failed: Zero-energy verification (try-step) is performed before work starts. A percentage is not a verdict, and your auditor knows that before they leave the site.
Evaluate your field inspection posture, proof integrity, and regulatory audit defense in under two minutes.
Step 1 · Sector & Standard
Move beyond static checklists. Auditflow provides operational process walkthroughs, statutory provenance, and verifiable evidence checklists built for SEBI CSCRF, RBI, CIS AWS, and ISO standards.
Qualified Stock Brokers (QSBs), Depository Participants, Regulated Intermediaries
Operational inspection of 24x7 SOC telemetry, multi-factor authentication enforcement, 4-hour RTO disaster recovery drills, and board cybersecurity committee review minutes.
The actual problem
They fail because the evidence was never captured in a form anyone else can verify. These are the three ways it goes wrong.
Findings recorded on paper clipboards and WhatsApp messages that get buried and lost.
100% offline mobile audits with GPS/device-stamped photo proof and automatic mathematical scoring.
Non-compliances sit unaddressed until the next surprise regulatory or certification visit.
Every failed question automatically creates a tracked CAPA ticket with an assignee, SLA, and countdown.
Spending 3 to 4 weeks before each external audit assembling photo binders and spreadsheets.
1-click Evidence Pack export: verified inspection answers and signed proof mapped to each clause.
Auditing ISO 27001, SOC 2 and HIPAA separately, answering the same access control questions three times.
Single-Audit Multiplier: evidence captured once satisfies equivalent requirements across 36 frameworks.
A photo in a WhatsApp group has no timestamp an assessor will accept, no location, and no link to the question it answers. When someone asks 'when was this taken and where', the honest answer is nobody knows.
What AuditFlow does
Every photo is captured in-app, tied to the specific question it evidences, and carries two timestamps: the device's own, and the moment AuditFlow's servers received the file. The report prints both, so a gap between them is visible rather than hidden, and it flags photos whose device-reported time or location does not hang together — a capture time after the upload, a jump between photos no vehicle could make — for a reviewer to look at. Those are plausibility checks, not proof. Every audit records where it was submitted; individual photos carry a location too on questions whose template asks for one (Growth and above).
The audit gets done. Fifteen findings get written down. Four get fixed. Nobody notices the other eleven until the same ones appear in next quarter's audit, and the quarter after that.
What AuditFlow does
Findings become action items with an owner, a due date and an escalation path. The failure heatmap shows you exactly which questions keep failing across sites (Growth and above).
The work was done. The evidence exists — scattered across email, a shared drive, three phones and a filing cabinet. Assembling it costs a week of a senior person's time, every single time.
What AuditFlow does
Evidence is filed against the framework control it satisfies as it is captured. The gap analysis tells you what is missing while there is still time to fix it (Growth and above).
Find your fit
Pick the job you came for. Each answer lists what AuditFlow does for it, the plan each piece is on, the technology underneath — and what it does not do.
SOC 2
See exactly which criteria you meet, hold the evidence in one place, and hand your auditor a clean list.
All 61 Trust Services Criteria across the five categories, resolved from your own records, with monitoring, access reviews, vendor reviews and an auditor engagement beside them.
Framework readiness
Every one of the 61 criteria listed, each resolved from evidence you already hold — the rest is the gap, by name.
Continuous monitoring
14 checks on the cadence each declares. 12 read your workspace's records; 2 read GitHub with a credential you supply, and show "not connected" until you do.
Evidence library
Attach an artefact once to every control it evidences, with a validity window — expired evidence stops counting.
Bulk evidence intake
Upload a batch or a ZIP of last year's evidence; text is extracted with the page, row or cell it came from, identifiers are redacted first, and suggested control mappings wait for a person to accept them.
User access reviews
Campaigns per system, every line decided by a named reviewer, and a campaign that will not close half-done.
Vendor risk
Vendors tiered from what they touch and how critical they are, with a review cadence and a reviewer's record.
Policies and training
Policies with version history and a per-member acknowledgement record; training completions per person.
Auditor engagement
A period, a lead auditor, a scope and a prepared-by-client request list your auditor raises and you answer.
Readiness computed from four kinds of evidence
Each requirement is resolved from a control test, a monitoring check, an audit question mapped to that control, or a live artefact in the evidence library. If any read fails, the percentage is withheld rather than shown low.
2,140 crosswalk links
Implement a control once and see where else it applies. A related control is a labelled signal with its basis printed — it is never marked met on your behalf.
Hash-chained, append-only audit trail
Governance events commit to the previous entry's hash, the database refuses edits and deletes, and verification recomputes every link on the server.
What it does not do: AuditFlow prepares you and organises the evidence; the SOC 2 report itself is issued by an independent CPA firm you engage. We do not introduce you to one, and there is no endpoint agent or cloud scanner.
How it works
No training course and no implementation project. Pick a checklist, walk the site, hand over the report.
Pick a template that already knows your standard
Choose from 344 templates covering 15 industries — each one already carrying weighted questions, auditor guidance and clause references. Or build your own.
Run the audit where the work happens
On a phone, offline if needed. Capture photos, with a location fix on the questions your template asks for one. Dictate notes by voice. The app scores as you go so you know the result before you leave the floor.
Findings become work, not paperwork
Failed questions convert to action items with owners and due dates. Overdue items escalate. Repeat failures surface on the heatmap (Growth and above).
Hand the assessor a report, not a shoebox
Download the audit report as a PDF — findings, evidence, and the working papers and sampling basis behind them (Starter and above) — share an expiring, revocable portal with an external auditor that downloads only the files you share with their engagement, each download logged (Scale and above), or export the evidence pack for the control they asked about (Growth and above). Sign-off records who signed, in what role, in the tamper-evident trail.
From offline mobile capture on the factory floor to 1-click regulator dossiers — click each step to inspect the live engine.
Stored locally in IndexedDB while underground or in cellular dead-zones; automatically syncs when reconnected.
Walkthroughs
4 jobs, start to finish — every step is something the product does today.
Walkthrough
A single audit, followed the whole way. Nothing here is set up in advance beyond creating the workspace: the questionnaire already exists, the phone does not need a signal, and the document at the end is produced by the same engine that scored the answers.
Install one of 344 templates covering 15 industries. Each arrives with its questions already weighted, auditor guidance written against the clause, and the framework references attached to the individual questions rather than to the template as a whole. Edit anything you like before anybody runs it.
Answers, notes and photographs are written to local device storage as the auditor works, and sync when connectivity returns. Starting an audit works the same way. The one requirement is that the device opened the app while it still had signal, because there is no way to fetch a questionnaire that was never fetched.
A photograph is captured in the app, stamped with the device time, and attached to the specific question it evidences rather than to the audit in general. The submission records where it was made. On questions whose template asks for one, the photograph carries a location fix too (Growth and above).
The result panel recomputes as answers arrive, using the same scoring function the submission uses, against the same pinned questionnaire and the template's own pass mark. While anything scorable is unanswered it reads as provisional and declines to call the audit anything — three of forty answered is arithmetically a perfect score and completely misleading.
A question marked critical fails the audit whatever the percentage says, and nothing answered later undoes it. The panel names the question rather than just the outcome, because "you are heading for a fail" is an alarm and "because the fire exit is blocked" is an instruction — and the second one is also the list the auditor reads back to the site manager before leaving.
The photograph bytes go up first and the submission second, so nothing arrives after the report that cites it. The submission carries a reference the device minted when the form opened, so a replay from two tabs or a lost response creates one audit rather than two.
The audit goes to review and a reviewer approves it, which is also the moment the findings are raised. Sign-offs, approvals, score overrides, report shares and role changes are appended to a per-organisation hash chain, each entry committing to the one before it, and any member can ask the server to recompute the whole chain.
A failed question converts to an action item with a named owner and a due date. Overdue items escalate on the SLA rules you set, severity by severity. The questions that keep failing across sites surface on the heat map, so the difference between a local problem and a systemic one is visible (Growth).
A real PDF, generated server-side — findings, the evidence, and from Starter the working papers and the sampling basis behind them, including the seed that reproduces the selection. For the one control an assessor asked about, export the evidence pack instead (Growth). A report refuses rather than silently printing a short list, because a report is read once, in a meeting, with no banner around it.
Every step above is on the entry plan except the failure heat map, per-question location capture and the evidence pack, which are Growth, and the working papers, which are Starter. The plan each capability sits on is on the price list rather than left to be discovered.
AI
Every AI control here drafts, explains or describes. None of them decides. No model sets whether an audit passed, writes an auditor's answer or raises a finding — the scoring engine does the first, a qualified person does the other two. The name on the report is your auditor's, and an inspector holds them to it, not us.
The hardest part of adopting any audit tool is the blank template. Say what your business does and what you want checked, and you get a drafted questionnaire — wording, answer types and auditor guidance — open in an editor. Change any question, delete any question, then save. Nothing exists until you save it.
About five seconds, and it costs no credits — it is the first thing you do on day one.
Ask who has overdue items, which site keeps failing the same check, or what is due before the next inspection — and get an answer from your own audits, findings and deadlines. It reads with your permissions, so a member restricted to one site gets answers about that site and nothing else.
Counts are exact and a list says what it left out. If it cannot read the workspace it tells you it is answering generally, rather than inventing a workspace that sounds right.
Draft a corrective action from a finding. Explain why a score came out where it did. Describe what is in an evidence photo. Propose questions for a control you have no coverage on. Clean up a note dictated while walking a line.
The photo analyser describes what it sees and does not rate the risk — a model's guess at a risk level from one photograph would be a made-up assessment sitting in a compliance file.
Every AI control prints its own price, read from one list rather than typed beside the button. Some cost nothing because no model is called at all — "Prefill from past audits" is the statistical mode of your own previous answers to the same question, which is a database read. When a model call fails, the credits go back.
Governance, risk and compliance
Compliance tooling generally evidences a control by watching a system. An inspection is the other kind of evidence, and it is the kind a site-based regulator asks for. AuditFlow does both — so a requirement here can be evidenced by a control test, by a monitoring check, or by an audit question a named auditor answered standing in front of the thing, scored by the engine and pinned to the questionnaire it was filled against. That third kind of evidence is the one an assessor asks for and the one software alone cannot produce.
All 93 ISO 27001 Annex A controls, each with your decision, your justification for including or excluding it, and whether it is implemented. The document a certification auditor asks for first.
It refuses to export while any control is undecided or unjustified, and names the ones blocking it. Clause 6.1.3 d) asks for the reason on the controls you kept, not only the ones you dropped.
Scope, context, interested parties, roles and authorities, objectives with their own metric, and management review against the 10 inputs the standard itself requires. Clauses 4 to 10, held as records rather than asked as questions.
A review cannot be signed off while a required input is blank or no decision has been recorded — clause 9.3.3 wants outputs, and a review with no decision was a status meeting.
2,140 links between frameworks, 1,654 of them structural: the 12 ISO management-system standards share clauses 4 to 10 by design, so one management review is evidence for each of those standards you run.
A crosswalked control is never silently marked met. It shows as a separate, labelled signal with the basis printed, and you decide whether it reaches — a readiness figure inflated by a mapping nobody agreed to is worse than no mapping.
Unified canonical controls spanning 10 security domains mapped across 36 frameworks. One test result or audit question simultaneously satisfies clauses in ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, RBI, and SOX — delivering up to 5x reduction in duplicate audit fieldwork.
The efficiency multiplier is derived from actual workspace test records, eliminating redundant testing hours for multi-framework compliance programs.
Bridges operational risk register entries directly to mitigating controls, test statuses, and PCAOB financial & ITGC assertions. One-click export for statutory auditors and Board Audit Committees.
Provides continuous assurance scoring: immediately flags deficient controls or unmitigated inherent risks before statutory reviewers discover them.
One artefact, linked to every control it genuinely evidences, with a validity window. The penetration test you commissioned once stops being evidence on the date it stops being evidence.
The number worth watching is controls covered ONLY by expired evidence — they look covered on any screen that counts links instead of live links, and they are what a surveillance audit finds.
Record of processing activities under Article 30, DPIAs under Article 35, cross-border transfers with their mechanism, and data subject requests on the statutory clock — GDPR and the India DPDP Act.
Previously the product could ask whether you had a ROPA and could not hold one. The DSAR deadline is stored rather than recomputed, and every period quotes the article it comes from.
An engagement with a period, a lead auditor and a scope statement, and a prepared-by-client list where the auditor raises each request and you answer it against the evidence you already hold.
A returned request must carry a reason. A rejection with no reason is a request nobody can act on, which is the dead end this replaces.
Every requirement across 36 frameworks, resolved from your own records — a control test, a monitoring result, or an audit question mapped to that control. One figure, and it shows its working.
If any part of it could not be read, the percentage is withheld rather than shown low.
14 checks on the cadence each one declares. 12 of them need no integration at all — they read this workspace's own records — and the rest read a system you connect with your own API credential.
A check nobody has connected reads “not connected”, never “pass”. Unmeasured and good are different answers.
A public page a buyer reads before they ask you for anything, on its own revocable token, plus an approval gate for the documents you will not publish. They ask, you approve, they get a link that expires.
You can withdraw a grant you have already approved, and the record of who had access stays.
The same forty questions arrive in different words every time. Answer them once, approve the wording, and the next questionnaire arrives mostly answered — with each row recording whether a person wrote it.
Only an answer somebody approved is ever suggested, and editing one withdraws its approval.
Every vendor tiered from two facts you already know — what they touch, and how badly their outage hurts — with a review cadence that falls out of the tier and a reviewer's signed record of each one.
The tier is computed, never typed. An unacceptable review raises a risk on the register somebody manages.
Campaigns that refuse to close while a line is undecided, and a register of every AI system you use, classified against the EU AI Act's own four bands, with the duties that band carries — between 1 and 10 of them — printed beside it.
Every obligation names the article or clause that imposes it and links to the text. We suggest a classification; you decide it.
There is no agent on your laptops and no automatic discovery of the SaaS tools your team signs up for — both need an integration per device and per identity provider, and a register that pretended to be complete would hide exactly the system nobody remembered. You declare the systems; the product watches them. Nor do we introduce you to an auditor: this is not a marketplace. The cross-framework crosswalk never marks a control met on its own — it shows you the related evidence and you decide whether it reaches your scope. And the Statement of Applicability is ISO 27001's requirement, not every framework's: we do not invent one where the standard does not ask for it.
Building toward SOC 2 or ISO 27001 as a startup? See the path by stageFeatures
Capture it on the floor, close it out, and hand somebody the proof. Nothing here is on a roadmap.
Capabilities differ by plan — the pricing table below says which plan carries what.
Connect it
The work around an audit programme — a folder of last year's evidence, a storage policy that says files stay in your bucket, a ticketing system that wants to know when an audit fails. Each piece below names the plan it is on and what it does not do.
Upload up to 200 files in one batch, or a ZIP of up to 200, at up to 50 MB a file. Text is extracted from plain text, CSV, Excel (.xlsx), Word (.docx) and PDF files that carry a text layer, with the page, row, cell or paragraph each passage came from — and each file comes back with suggested controls it may evidence, each quoting the passage behind it. A person accepts, rejects or reassigns every suggestion, and an accepted one lands in the evidence library. Nothing is marked met on its own.
Before any text is kept or shown to a model, 16 kinds of identifier are redacted — email addresses, phone numbers, Aadhaar numbers, PANs, card numbers, API keys and more — and a file that still matches after redaction is held for a person instead. Names and addresses are only caught behind a label, and the screen says so. The model step is opt-in for each batch and costs 2 AI credits a file. Scanned pages and photographs are read only by OCR (next card); without it they go to a person.
A scanned PDF or a photograph of a signed register has no text layer, so ordinary extraction reads nothing. With OCR switched on for a batch, the file is transcribed page by page, and the text then goes through exactly the same redaction, citation and suggest-then-accept path as any other file — up to 30 pages and 15 MB a file, at 4 AI credits a file. On any other plan, an admin can ask for the OCR add-on from the intake screen and we get in touch.
It is the one path where the FILE, not redacted text, goes to the OCR provider (Google Gemini) — there is nothing to redact until the page has been read. So it is off by default, switched on per batch, and the batch records who switched it on. Handwriting and poor scans transcribe imperfectly; every suggestion still needs a person to accept it.
Store the original files of your document vault in a bucket you own — Amazon S3, Cloudflare R2, MinIO, Google Cloud Storage or another S3-compatible service. The connection is tested before it is switched on, including a check that the bucket refuses an unauthenticated read, and a connection that later fails refuses uploads rather than quietly storing them with us. Your credentials are encrypted and only the last four characters of the key ID are ever shown again.
It covers new document-vault versions uploaded after you switch it on. Earlier files are not moved, and audit photos, attachments and every database record stay with AuditFlow — so it is not a way to keep all of your data inside your own infrastructure.
A REST API under /api/v1 with 17 scopes, so a key can read audits and nothing else. Every key is shown once and kept only as a hash, expires within 365 days, and can be rotated with an overlap of up to 24 hours. A key can never do more than the member who issued it can do today — demote them and the key loses the power the same minute.
An OpenAPI 3.1 document at /api/v1/openapi.json, generated from the same source as the in-product docs, for client generators. A cross-workspace id answers not found, never a hint that it exists.
8 events — an audit submitted, completed, failed or overdue, an action item created, resolved or overdue, a member joining — sent to your endpoint and signed with HMAC-SHA256 over a timestamp and the body, with an event id that stays the same on every retry. Retries are signed too, and every attempt is in a delivery log you can retry from.
The reference receiver in the docs refuses a delivery older than 5 minutes, and the event id lets yours refuse the same event twice. The older body-only signature is still sent, so existing receivers keep working.
The server records when each photograph arrived and, within a per-submission budget, a SHA-256 of the bytes as they landed — beside the time and place the phone reported. The audit page and the PDF flag what does not fit: a capture time after the upload, a photo taken before the audit started, a jump between photos no vehicle could make, and — once you have entered a site's location — a photo taken away from it (500 metres unless you set the site's own radius).
These are flags for a reviewer, never refusals — a phone offline in a basement for two days is legitimate — and they are plausibility checks, not proof. There is no hardware attestation: this is a web app, and a phone's clock and location are claims the device makes.
Market Comparison
Purpose-built for operational audit integrity: offline mobile execution, dual maker-checker governance, zero-hallucination OCR, and board-ready decks.
| Capability & Dimension | AuditFlow Platform | SafetyCulture (iAuditor) | AuditBoard / TeamMate | Vanta / Sprinto | Spreadsheets / Paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational ExecutionOffline-First Mobile Plant & Factory Floor PWA Audits happen in steel-shielded plants, basements, cold stores, and remote yards where cellular and Wi-Fi signals fail. | FullBuilt-in Native Full offline PWA with local IndexedDB queue and vector QR tags | Full Native mobile app with offline checklist support | None No offline mobile PWA; desktop browser bound | None No frontline inspection capability | Partial Physical paper functions without connectivity, but requires duplicate manual entry |
| Assurance GovernanceMaker-Checker Dual Authorization (Four-Eyes Principle) Regulated standards and institutional audit governance strictly forbid self-approval. Preparers and checkers must be segregated. | FullBuilt-in Native Built-in dual authorization workflow enforcing Four-Eyes principle | None Single-user submit and complete | Full Enterprise workflow review tiers | None No maker-checker operational workflow | None Untracked email sign-offs and unverified signatures |
| Vision IntelligenceZero-Hallucination OCR for Registers & Job Cards Plant audits and dealership inspections constantly encounter handwritten gate registers, calibration stickers, and delivery challans. | FullBuilt-in Native Specialized OCR with strict verification fallbacks and PII redaction | None No specialized zero-hallucination paperwork extraction | None No OCR document extraction engine | None No physical document OCR | None 100% manual transcription from paper |
| Enterprise ArchitectureMulti-Department & Functional Unit Scoping Manufacturing plants and automotive enterprises operate distinct functional units (BIW, Paint Shop, Powertrain, Assembly, Sales, Service, QA, Finance) with unique leadership and accountability. | FullBuilt-in Native Native department taxonomy scoping audits, staff, findings, and reports | Partial Simple group and site tags | Partial Cost centers and business units | None Cloud accounts and software repositories only | None Isolated spreadsheets with no centralized department scoping |
| Executive DeliverablesCustomizable Board Decks (.PPTX), Word (.DOCX) & Direct Dispatch Audit Committees and Boards of Directors do not read 80-page checklist printouts; they require high-impact 16:9 executive presentation decks, editable Word workpapers, and rapid distribution. | FullBuilt-in Native In-place report builder with 5 themes, PPTX/DOCX export, and 1-click stakeholder dispatch | Partial Standard PDF checklist exports only; no board decks or direct dispatch | Partial Custom reports requiring external BI or Workiva add-ons | Partial PDF gap analysis and readiness summaries | Partial Manual PowerPoint creation taking 12–20 hours per audit cycle |
| Framework CoverageUnified Operational + Enterprise GRC Crosswalk Frontline operational proof must satisfy ISO, IATF, and SOX controls simultaneously without asking duplicate questions. | FullBuilt-in Native 344 pre-built templates across 36 frameworks with direct RCM crosswalk | None Operational checklists with zero GRC or framework crosswalk | Partial SOX and financial controls; manual operational evidence ingest | Partial Cloud IT standards only (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA) | None Manual cross-referencing across separate compliance matrices |
| Security & Evidence IntegrityCryptographic SHA-256 Tamper-Evident Hash Chain External regulators, statutory auditors, and litigation require undeniable proof that audit records, sign-offs, and scores were not quietly modified after the fact. | FullBuilt-in Native Append-only hash chain with database-enforced immutability | Partial Standard application audit log | Partial Database audit log tables | Partial Vendor system activity logs | None Zero tamper protection; files can be edited or deleted without trace |
| Commercial EfficiencyTransparent Self-Serve Pricing vs. Enterprise Lock-in Enterprise software shouldn't require mandatory sales qualification calls, multi-month contract negotiations, or $50,000 upfront consulting fees. | FullBuilt-in Native Self-serve transparent pricing from ₹999 ($12) to ₹49,999 ($599)/mo with 80–85% margin efficiency | Partial Seat-based pricing with steep add-on charges | None $50,000–$150,000+ annual minimum contracts with mandatory onboarding fees | None $15,000–$45,000+ annual subscriptions | Partial Appears free upfront, but costs hundreds of hours in manual labor |
Instead of paying for SafetyCulture on plant floors, AuditBoard for SOX committees, and Vanta for cloud readiness, AuditFlow provides the single unified system of record.
Industries
Every industry below ships with real templates carrying weighted questions, auditor guidance and clause references. Not category placeholders.
Factory floors, plant safety, machine pre-starts & ISO 9001
Verifiable Result: Zero unaddressed floor defects and instant audit clearance for external assessors.
Start free audit for ManufacturingThe figure against each industry is how many templates ship for it today.
Framework coverage
Evidence platforms built for SaaS security assume your evidence is an API call away. Ours assumes it is a photograph of a damaged rack upright, taken in a warehouse with no signal.
Each framework has a real control library in the product, and template questions map to specific clauses within it.
IN — India-specific framework
Economic value
See how many staff hours and compliance overhead costs your team eliminates across your facilities each year.
Calculate annual time and direct cost saved by eliminating manual paper binders.
Based on real enterprise audit telemetry: 2.25 hours saved per inspection through offline mobile capture, instant photo GPS tagging, and 1-click evidence pack compilation.
Pricing
Every plan states the users, sites and storage it includes. If your team does not fit one, build your own below: the same features, priced per user, with the allowances scaling with the team. Every plan captures audits offline with photo evidence, and the storage allowance covers everything you keep — photos, documents and attachments alike. Need more room? Extra storage can be added to any plan.
Shown for comparison. Billing is in INR and needs an Indian billing state for the GST invoice — talk to us if you are outside India.
The whole product, one site, real money
Anyone who wants to run their own audit before committing to a tier — and keep the workspace either way.
Paid plan · billing straight after signup
A few sites, one team, done properly
A small operation running recurring checks — one plant and its warehouse, a handful of clinics or outlets.
Paid plan · billing straight after signup
Most chosen
Multi-site, with the analytics to run it
Compliance teams covering several sites who need to see where failures repeat.
Paid plan · billing straight after signup
For programmes an external auditor will inspect
Regulated organisations who must hand evidence to a certification body or regulator.
Paid plan · billing straight after signup
Procurement, security review, the whole thing
Organisations with an SSO mandate, a procurement process or a security questionnaire.
Build your own
The same capabilities as the plan you pick, priced by the number of people who use them. Sites, storage, audits and AI credits scale with the team.
$6 a user a month
Paid plan · billing straight after signup
Inspect the exact allowances, governance modules and security controls enforced at each tier.
| Feature / Limit | Essentials | Starter | Growth | Scale | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SitesCore Operations | 1 | 3 | 25 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Team membersCore Operations | 3 | 15 | 50 | 150 | Unlimited |
TemplatesInspection Engine | 3 | 25 | All 344 + custom | All 344 + custom | All 344 + custom |
Audits / monthInspection Engine | 20 | 300 | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Evidence storageStorage & AI | 50 MB | 1 GB | 1 GB | 1 GB | 1 GB |
AI credits / monthStorage & AI | 60 | 500 | 1,200 | 3,000 | 6,000 |
Photo evidenceInspection Engine | Included | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Device-reported GPS on photosInspection Engine | — | — | Included | Included | Included |
Pass conditions & critical questionsInspection Engine | — | — | Included | Included | Included |
Bulk import (CSV / Excel)Core Operations | — | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Conditional questions & clause mappingInspection Engine | — | — | — | Included | Included |
Risk register & CAPA workflowGovernance & GRC | — | — | Included | Included | Included |
Continuous monitoring & Trust CenterGovernance & GRC | — | — | Included | Included | Included |
External auditor portalAuditor Collaboration | — | — | — | Included | Included |
White-label branded reportsAuditor Collaboration | — | — | — | Included | Included |
REST API accessEnterprise & Integration | — | — | — | Included | Included |
SSO / SAML scopingEnterprise & Integration | — | — | — | — | Included |
Every plan is paid from the day you sign up — there is no free trial. Essentials starts at $12/mo for the whole product on one site, so you can run a real audit before deciding whether you need Growth or Scale. Cancel anytime; your workspace becomes read-only rather than being deleted, and you can export everything at any point.
Walkthrough
Send us the checklist you use today. We will build it into AuditFlow and walk you through running it — so you are evaluating your actual audit, not a generic demo.
Security
Our customers assess suppliers for a living, so they ask harder questions than most. These are the answers, and the controls behind them are built against the standards you already work to.
Zero external model training and zero retention of working papers or configuration evidence. Document ingestion automatically performs client-side masking of financial PII (PAN, Aadhaar, Demat/BOID accounts, bank credentials). Stored evidence and tamper-evident audit trails can be encrypted using Customer-Managed Keys (BYOK via AWS KMS CMK). Deployable as dedicated private VPC instances or air-gapped on-premises containers.
Row-level security on every table, keyed to your organisation. A query cannot return another tenant's rows even if application code asks it to — the guarantee sits below the app, not inside it.
Sign-offs, approvals, score overrides, report shares, role changes and permission changes are appended to a per-organisation SHA-256 hash chain, each entry committing to the one before it. Any member can have the server recompute the whole chain: an entry edited or removed after the fact does not verify. The database revokes UPDATE and DELETE on the trail and refuses them again in a trigger. The broader activity feed is not chained, and is deleted on the retention schedule you set. Photos carry capture time, and a location on questions whose template asks for one.
Three roles, plus a permission matrix that revokes capabilities from Auditor and Viewer at the point the action is performed rather than only in the interface — it can narrow a role, never widen one. Configurable session timeouts, enforced MFA and IP allowlisting. SSO / SAML is not switched on: Enterprise records your IdP details and we scope the work with you, and every account signs in with a password today. External auditors get expiring, revocable, logged read-only access to the whole workspace's finished audits, and download only the files you share with their engagement — every download logged (Scale and above).
Set how long audits, activity logs and notifications are kept, with a notice period before the first deletion and a permanent hold on signed-off audits. Data is held in India — Supabase, AWS ap-south-1. An org admin can download a workspace archive of your records at any time — evidence files are downloaded one by one; deletion happens when you ask for it, not on our schedule.
FAQ
Those tools watch your cloud, your laptops and your identity provider, and they are good at it — check what they cover on their own sites rather than taking our word for it. The point is what a machine can observe at all. A large part of ISO 27001, SOC 2, FSSAI, HACCP and every safety framework is about physical things, people and procedures — whether the exit was blocked, whether the log was signed, whether the training happened, none of which any agent reads. AuditFlow evidences a requirement from a control test, an automated check, OR an audit question a named auditor answered standing in front of the thing. If your obligations are entirely about software, you probably do not need us. If they are not, the half nobody is covering is the half an assessor asks about first.
SafetyCulture is built around frontline checklists and safety inspections, but does not provide continuous cloud compliance, a public Trust Center, or an ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability. AuditBoard is built for enterprise internal audit and SOX committees, but starts at thousands of dollars a month, takes months of configuration, and has no offline mobile PWA with asset QR tagging for field and factory floors. AuditFlow unifies both ends: field inspectors capture operational evidence on phones with offline sync and printable QR tags, and that exact operational proof flows directly into enterprise control tests, framework crosswalks, and board audit committee packs.
AuditFlow holds 2,140 links between frameworks. 1,654 of them are structural rather than editorial: the 12 ISO management-system standards are written to the same Harmonized Structure, so clause 9.3 is management review in every one of them and the evidence is the same record. ISO 27001 against SOC 2 has no shared numbering, so those links are ours and each one prints its reasoning and how far it goes — equivalent, partial or merely related. What the crosswalk never does is mark a control met on your behalf. It shows you that A.5.15 is evidenced and that we read it as equivalent to CC6.1; whether that reaches for your scope is your call, and your auditor's. A readiness figure inflated by a mapping nobody agreed to is worse than no mapping at all.
Yes, as a real PDF, across all 93 Annex A controls — and it refuses to produce one while any control is undecided or carries a decision with no justification, naming the controls that are blocking it. Clause 6.1.3 d) asks for the justification on the controls you include as well as the ones you exclude, which is the half most tools skip. Applicability and implementation are kept as separate questions, because "this applies to us and we have not built it yet" is the normal state during preparation and collapsing it into one tick is what makes an SoA read as a lie.
It holds the records. A record of processing activities under Article 30, DPIAs under Article 35 with the screening decision kept even when the answer is "not required", a cross-border transfer register with the mechanism named, and data subject requests on the statutory clock. Every period quotes the article or section it comes from — and where the DPDP Act leaves the period to Rules rather than fixing it, the product says so and lets you set the date rather than inventing an obligation. Screening suggests whether a DPIA is required and never decides it: that determination is one you are legally accountable for.
An afternoon for a single site. Create your workspace, pick templates matching your industry, invite your team, and run your first audit the same day. There is no mandatory onboarding call and no implementation fee.
Yes — including starting one. Answers, notes and photos are written to local device storage as you work and sync automatically when connectivity returns; the photos upload before the submission, so nothing arrives after the report, and a submission that gets sent twice still lands once. Open the app while you still have signal so the template is on the device, then walk the site with none. This is the main reason teams pick us over browser-only tools — cold stores, plant rooms and remote sites rarely have reliable signal.
Yes. Build from scratch in the template builder on any plan — your own questions and sections, the answer type, whether an answer is required, and the weight each question carries. Pass/fail conditions and marking a question critical come with Growth; conditional questions, clause mappings and a custom grade ladder come with Scale. Importing a CSV or Excel workbook is Starter and above. Most teams start from a library template and edit it.
No, and it cannot. Pass or fail is computed by the scoring engine from the answers your auditor gave and the rules on the template — the same function everywhere the result is shown, so a report cannot disagree with the screen it came from. AI drafts templates, suggests corrective actions, explains a score and describes what is in a photo. None of that can set a verdict, fill in an answer or raise a finding, and sign-offs and approvals go into a hash chain that records who accepted what. Where AI does write something — an audit summary, a narrative for a board pack — it is stored as AI-generated prose, labelled as such, and it never changes a score. The evidence-photo analyser deliberately does not rate risk: a model's guess from one photograph does not belong in a compliance file.
Every plan, including the entry tier, carries a monthly allowance of AI credits — 60 a month at the entry price, more on each tier above, and top-up packs if you run out. Each control prints its own cost before you press it: most are 1 to 4 credits, and a few cost nothing because no model is called. Drafting a template from a description is not charged at all. If a model call fails, the credits are returned.
Your workspace becomes read-only rather than being deleted. An org admin can download the workspace archive at any time, including after a downgrade — a ZIP of CSV records for your audits, findings, action items and the rest. Evidence files and PDF reports are not inside it; you download those individually from the audit or document they belong to. Full deletion happens only when you explicitly request it.
A DPA, our subprocessor list, a security practices summary and a completed copy of your own security questionnaire. We do not hold an ISO 27001 certificate or a SOC 2 report, and we will not imply that we do. What we can show you is what the product enforces: row-level security on every table keyed to your organisation; workspace settings to require MFA, restrict access to an IP allowlist and time out idle sessions; a hash-chained, append-only audit trail of governance events that can be re-verified server-side; and share and auditor links that always carry an expiry and can be revoked.
Every table enforces row-level security keyed to your organisation, so a query can only ever return your rows — isolation is enforced by the database itself rather than by application code remembering to filter. Evidence files are scoped the same way. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest.
Yes, on Scale and above — a read-only link you can expire or revoke, with access logged. It is the whole workspace's completed audits and findings, read-only: there is no per-site or per-framework narrowing yet, so share it when you are content for the auditor to see everything finished. Files are the exception: nothing in your evidence library or document vault is exposed by default, and the auditor downloads only what you share with their engagement, each download logged on the engagement page. The public compliance scorecard is separate and is on every plan, if you want to show customers your status.
Yes. Starter covers up to 3 sites and Growth up to 25; cross-site comparison and failure heatmaps start on Growth, and Scale has no site limit. Multi-org rollups are available for groups managing separate legal entities.
Each plan includes a number of users — 15 on Starter, 50 on Growth, 150 on Scale. If your team does not fit a plan, build your own: pick Starter, Growth or Scale features and pay per user (from ₹399 to ₹549 a user a month; at least 5, 20 and 50 users respectively), with sites, storage and AI credits scaling with the team. Changing the number of users later is prorated when it goes up and takes effect at renewal when it goes down.
Yes. In regulated and high-assurance environments, dual authorization is critical. Field auditors and audit assistants submit their working papers and evidence as Makers. An independent Checker — such as an Audit Manager, Team Leader, or Partner — conducts a secondary review, can flag specific items for rework with reviewer notes, or grant formal sign-off. The system enforces segregation of duties by refusing self-approval by the maker.
Yes. AuditFlow includes specialized automotive and discrete manufacturing templates aligned with IATF 16949 and VDA 6.3 standards. These cover Body-in-White (BIW) stamping and weld integrity, Paint Shop surface treatment and dry film thickness (DFT), Powertrain cold-testing, Final Assembly End-of-Line (EOL) monsoon shower and dyno testing, and AIAG CQI-8 Layered Process Audits (LPA). For retail automotive networks, it includes Dealership Showroom Sales governance and Service Workshop & Bodyshop operational audits.
Frontline audits frequently encounter handwritten gate registers, calibration stickers, and paper delivery challans. Rather than using unconstrained AI that guesses or hallucinates smudged characters, our OCR extraction engine uses a strict zero-hallucination constraint: any ambiguous number, VIN digit, or signature that cannot be read with high confidence is explicitly flagged as [MANUAL_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED] for human confirmation before persisting to the audit record.
Yes. In the Report Builder, you can filter and scope by operational department or site, include executive summaries, sample sizes, and corrective action matrices, and export to three distinct formats: a formal print-ready PDF, a formatted Word (.DOC) working paper summary, or a 16:9 widescreen presentation slide deck (.PPTX) structured specifically for Board and Audit Committee presentations.
Pick a template, walk the floor with your phone, and see the finished report before you get back to your desk. That is the whole evaluation.